- From: Janina Sajka <janina@a11y.nyc>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 19:41:03 -0400
- To: Michael Paciello <michael.paciello@audioeye.com>
- Cc: Accessibility at the Edge <public-a11yedge@w3.org>, Lionel Wolberger <lionel@userway.org>, Jason Taylor <jason@usablenet.com>
Mike Paciello writes:
> ...
>
> 4.) The colorized bleed over from the unclosed element in the first Aside
> still appears and needs to be corrected. I've also noticed that every "WCAG
> Reference" section includes some of that bleed over throughout the
> document, at least everywhere a list appears. The bullets in the list are
> also "Dodger Blue". Is that correct?
>
These are controled by CSS markup in the document header ...
<begin code>
<style>
.wcag2x {
font-weight: bold;
font-size: 110%;
color: DodgerBlue;
}
.Note {
font-weight: bold;
font-size: 110%;
color: darkred;
} }
</style>
</style>
<end code>
The .wcag2x and the .Note tokens activate the styling in the code
respectively as follows:
<aside class="wcag2x" title="WCAG Reference" aria-label="WCAG
Reference">
blah blah
</aside>
<aside class="Note" title="Note" aria-label="Note">
blah blah
</aside>
So, I don't understand how anything within the <aside> </aside> can be
at fault. Styling is created by the CSS values in the header.
I'm stumped, in other words!
>
> -Mike
>
>
>
> Mike Paciello
> Chief Accessibility Officer
> michael.paciello@audioeye.com
> +1.603.484.1938
>
> [image: AudioEye Registered Trademark Logo]
> [image: Follow us on LinkedIn for more accessibility tips!]
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/audioeye-inc/>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 12:29???PM Janina Sajka <janina@a11y.nyc> wrote:
>
> > Colleagues:
> >
> > I have implemented the edits identified in our 22 October
> > teleconference.
> >
> > Please review and advise on all points!!
> >
> > 1.) A new Sec 1.7.3: How We Evaluate Automatability
> > https://a11yedge.github.io/capabilities/#automate
> >
> > 2.) The 3 remaining Notes that are not about WCAG are now bolded and
> > colored dark red.
> >
> > If you think we should use different colors, give me CSS
> > recognized names!
> > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/named-color
> >
> > 3.) The additional <br> tags in the diagram description are now
> > gone. Should white space more like intended!
> >
> > 4.) Colorized bleed over from the unclosed element in the first
> > Aside should now be gone. Is it now all OK?
> >
> > Best,
> > Janina
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Janina Sajka (she/her/hers)
> > Accessibility Consultant https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka
> >
> > The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
> > Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
> >
> > Linux Foundation Fellow
> > https://www.linuxfoundation.org/board-of-directors-2/
> >
> >
>
> --
> The information in this communication is intended for the use of the
> individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information
> that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL and/or exempt from disclosure under law.
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
> prohibited.
--
Janina Sajka (she/her/hers)
Accessibility Consultant https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka
The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
Linux Foundation Fellow
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/board-of-directors-2/
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2025 23:41:08 UTC