Capabilities Draft Typographical Errors

All -

Following is an *initial* list of typographical errors I've identified in
the current Capabilities draft document:

1. *Abstract* - remove period after the word "capabilities"
2. *Section 1.2* - In the paragraph under the Note, remove the period after
the word "methods"
3. *Section 1.3* - The spacing in the fourth bulleted item "Does Not Apply"
and the hyphen that follows the phrase is different from the spacing for
the 3 previous bulleted items. Is this a code or formatting error?
4. *Section 4.4.2* - Under the subsection "Trade-Offs", initial cap the
first word, "post source"
5. *Section 4.4.6* - Under the subsection "Benefit", remove the extra space
between the period and the end of the sentence.
6. *Section 6.2.2* - Under the subsection "Benefit", remove the comma at
the end of the sentence ending with the word "proximate" and before the
period.
7. *Appendix B.1* - Initial-cap the word. "third-party" at the beginning of
the paragraph.

I am completely reviewing the entire document again (my last time, I
promise!). I just started Section 2 and expect to finish this evening at
some point.

Additionally, while I know we've had this discussion before, I do wonder
whether we should include a brief description, acknowledgement and link to
the Overlay Fact Sheet within Section 1.4 of our draft? It clearly is NOT a
regulatory ruling, though I am pretty sure I have seen it referenced in
some US State regulatory standards (Colorado OIT?). I've also recently
noticed that the document has gained new traction, likely as a result of
recent conferences where the topic of Overlays is still popular (i.e.,
M-Enabling, A11yTO). Additionally, Section 1.4 is not limited to regulatory
rulings; it's just that the introductory paragraph cites those regulatory
references.

Again, it's likely too late to make this, but as I think about it, I
believe doing so at least suggests that our research is objective, without
any technical prejudice. A single sentence acknowledging the work with a
link would suffice. However, I will support the decision of the group,
especially this is very late in the publication process.

-Mike

Mike Paciello
Chief Accessibility Officer
michael.paciello@audioeye.com
+1.603.484.1938

[image: AudioEye Registered Trademark Logo]
[image: Follow us on LinkedIn for more accessibility tips!]
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/audioeye-inc/>

-- 
The information in this communication is intended for the use of the 
individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information 
that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL and/or exempt from disclosure under law. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly 
prohibited.