Re: suggestion

An inheritor would [mostly] be other W3C documents (whether or not they are on a TR track or normative). So in this case, WCAG 3 would inherit the subset of functional needs that are relevant and appropriate. Another potential inheritor would be any external organizations or regulatory bodies that cite the list.

Hypothetical example mapping:

Use with limited hearing: 
W3C
WCAG3; FAST; XAUR; MAUR
External
Section 508; National Association of Deaf (sorry these are both US specific)
Use with sensorineural hearing loss (limited frequency range):
W3C
XAUR; MAUR; CSS Aural
External
ISO; Bluetooth SIG
Alternatively, once we collaboratively resolve which functional needs belong in WCAG 3; the burden could simply fall to the inheritor to cite this master, and no mapping would be necessary.

Cheers,


Charles Hall

Senior Accessibility Designer
Invited Expert, W3C AGWG & Silver TF
Chair, W3C IDIW CG
Member, Ferndale Accessibility & Inclusion Advisory Commission

> On Jul 16, 2020, at 1:30 PM, Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> 
> What do you mean by "mapping to an inheritor"?  I can think of several meanings and I would like to be clear what you mean.  
> 
> I like the highest level list.  KUTGW!  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jeanne
> 
> On 7/16/2020 10:07 AM, Charles Hall wrote:
>> My current working assumption is that regardless of the form this collection takes, a subset of needs would be available for and identified as mapping to an inheritor – including WCAG3.
>> 
>> In its current draft list format, the number of items may increase as I better understand and am able to articulate the unique intersectional needs of race and disability, as well as once the cognitive needs are reviewed by a wider audience. But I am confident that there will be consensus on a list that is larger and more inclusive than the EN 301 549 set, but less than the entire list.
>> 
>> Currently, I think the highest level categories are:
>> Essential
>> Sensory
>> Physical
>> Cognitive
>> Independence
>> 
>> 
>> Charles Hall
>> 
>> Senior Accessibility Designer
>> Invited Expert, W3C AGWG & Silver TF
>> Chair, W3C IDIW CG
>> Member, Ferndale Accessibility & Inclusion Advisory Commission
>> 
>>> On Jul 15, 2020, at 1:11 PM, Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com <mailto:jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I know this is premature, but something to keep in mind.
>>> 
>>> I was looking at the list of functional needs and realized that for our purposes in Silver, we will need a much smaller list at a higher level categories.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>