- From: Jeanne Spellman <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 13:30:25 -0400
- To: Charles Hall <hallmediamobile@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-a11y-functional-needs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87f79731-698e-7bae-9b08-0c36f3b07c69@spellmanconsulting.com>
What do you mean by "mapping to an inheritor"? I can think of several meanings and I would like to be clear what you mean. I like the highest level list. KUTGW! Thanks, jeanne On 7/16/2020 10:07 AM, Charles Hall wrote: > My current working assumption is that regardless of the form this > collection takes, a subset of needs would be available for and > identified as mapping to an inheritor – including WCAG3. > > In its current draft list format, the number of items may increase as > I better understand and am able to articulate the unique > intersectional needs of race and disability, as well as once the > cognitive needs are reviewed by a wider audience. But I am confident > that there will be consensus on a list that is larger and more > inclusive than the EN 301 549 set, but less than the entire list. > > Currently, I think the highest level categories are: > Essential > Sensory > Physical > Cognitive > Independence > > > Charles Hall > > Senior Accessibility Designer > Invited Expert, W3C AGWG & Silver TF > Chair, W3C IDIW CG > Member, Ferndale Accessibility & Inclusion Advisory Commission > >> On Jul 15, 2020, at 1:11 PM, Jeanne Spellman >> <jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com >> <mailto:jspellman@spellmanconsulting.com>> wrote: >> >> I know this is premature, but something to keep in mind. >> >> I was looking at the list of functional needs and realized that for >> our purposes in Silver, we will need a much smaller list at a higher >> level categories. >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 16 July 2020 17:30:39 UTC