- From: Geoff Huston <gih@telstra.net>
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 21:20:13 +1000
- To: "Brian Moore" <brian@BWMC.DEMON.CO.UK>, <pso-pc@w3.org>
I am not entirely comfortable with this proposal. One could argue that at
this point
in time it is the W3C's "turn" for such a nomination. Given that there is
already
an ETSI and an ITU-T and an IETF nomination sitting on the Board then
the case of a W3C nomination appears to be far more compelling than that of
ETSI
or the ITU.
Brian, I would be interested to understand your reasoning behind
your proposal given the above observations.
Kind regards,
Geoff Huston
At 11:40 AM 10/11/2002 +0100, Brian Moore wrote:
>Dear all,
>On the assumption that ICANN will adopt the final proposals from the
>Evolution and Reform Committee it would be a good idea for us to start
>considering how to fulfil the requirement for the TAC to appoint a
>rotating non-voting liaison member to
>the ICANN Board. Given that IETF/IAB has a permanent non-voting liaison,
>it would seem appropriate that the first and second TAC liaisons come from
>ETSI and ITU-T. Perhaps this could be discussed on the 16th.
>Brian.
>
>B W Moore
>Lucent Technologies
>Tel: +44 1206 762335
>Fax: +44 1206 762336
Received on Friday, 11 October 2002 07:26:42 UTC