Re: TAC

Dear Brian, dear all,

I support the inclusion of this point in the agenda of our forthcoming
teleconference.

Kind regards,
Azucena




"Brian Moore" <brian@BWMC.DEMON.CO.UK>@w3.org con fecha 11/10/2002 12:40:53

Enviado por:   pso-pc-request@w3.org


Destinatarios: <pso-pc@w3.org>
CC:
Asunto:   TAC



Dear all,
On the assumption that ICANN will adopt the final proposals from the
Evolution and Reform Committee it would be a good idea for us to start
considering how to fulfil the requirement for the TAC to appoint a rotating
non-voting liaison member to
the ICANN Board.  Given that IETF/IAB has a  permanent non-voting liaison,
it would seem appropriate that the first and  second TAC liaisons come from
ETSI and ITU-T. Perhaps this could be discussed on  the 16th.
Brian.

B W Moore
Lucent Technologies
Tel: +44 1206  762335
Fax: +44 1206 762336



___________________________________________________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si no es vd. el destinatario
indicado, queda notificado de que la utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin
autorización está prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha
recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique
inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.


This message is intended exclusively for its addressee and may contain
information that is CONFIDENTIAL and protected by professional privilege.
If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly
prohibited by law. If this message has been received in error, please
immediately notify us via e-mail and delete it.
___________________________________________________________________________

Received on Friday, 11 October 2002 07:01:10 UTC