- From: <azucena.hernandezperez@telefonica.es>
- Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 14:07:53 +0200
- To: pso-pc@w3.org
Dear Richard, dear PSO PC colleagues, Having now had the time to read carefully the Final Report from the E&R Committee, I see with satisfaction that the previous proposal of having TAC members elected by the Nominating Committee has been removed but the text "selection by the ICANN Board of 8 individuals out of nominations from the 4 bodies already in the PSO" could lead to misunderstandings. I agree with Richard and Brian on not finding which kind of reason could the ICANN Board have to reject a candidate proposed by our organizations as the most appropriate for TAC and therefore this selection should simply be a formal endorsement of the members proposed by the organizations . In the other hand I wonder whether this proposal could deal to the undesired extreme situation of having a TAC with 8 members from one of the 4 organizations if that organization sends 8 nominations that the ICANN Board likes more than those presented by the other organizations. I would prefer to have a common reply from the 4 organizations simply proposing the following text for bullet c) of TAC: "The TAC shall consist of 8 members with direct experience with technical standards issues relating to ICANN activities. They will be appointed by the ICANN Board based on 2 nominations from each of the following organizations: ETSI, IAB, ITU and W3C" Kind regards, Azucena richard.hill@itu.int@w3.org con fecha 04/10/2002 21:44:13 Enviado por: pso-pc-request@w3.org Destinatarios: pso-pc@w3.org CC: Asunto: TAC membership I guess you've all had a chance to look at the new ICANN bylaws and the part on TAC. The only thing that bothers me is the fact that the TAC members are nominated by the Board on the recommendation of the organizations comprising TAC. Personally, I don't see why the Board should be able to veto or refuse the nomination of a particular person from an organization. Does anybody else share my view? If yes, we could again send individual comments (or a joint one). Thanks and best, Richard ----------------------------------------- Richard Hill Counsellor, ITU-T SG2 International Telecommunication Union Place des Nations CH-1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland tel: +41 22 730 5887 FAX: +41 22 730 5853 Email: richard.hill@itu.int Study Group 2 email: tsbsg2@itu.int ___________________________________________________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial. Si no es vd. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización está prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee and may contain information that is CONFIDENTIAL and protected by professional privilege. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited by law. If this message has been received in error, please immediately notify us via e-mail and delete it. ___________________________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 7 October 2002 08:07:22 UTC