- From: Brian Moore <brian@bwmc.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 11:46:04 +0100
- To: <richard.hill@itu.int>, <pso-pc@w3.org>
Richard, Yes, I agree that it does not seem very constitutional. Brian. ----- Original Message ----- From: <richard.hill@itu.int> To: <pso-pc@w3.org> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 8:44 PM Subject: TAC membership > > I guess you've all had a chance to look at the new ICANN bylaws and the part > on TAC. > > The only thing that bothers me is the fact that the TAC members are > nominated by the Board on the recommendation of the organizations comprising > TAC. Personally, I don't see why the Board should be able to veto or refuse > the nomination of a particular person from an organization. > > Does anybody else share my view? If yes, we could again send individual > comments (or a joint one). > > Thanks and best, > Richard > > ----------------------------------------- > Richard Hill > Counsellor, ITU-T SG2 > International Telecommunication Union > Place des Nations > CH-1211 Geneva 20 > Switzerland > tel: +41 22 730 5887 > FAX: +41 22 730 5853 > Email: richard.hill@itu.int > Study Group 2 email: tsbsg2@itu.int >
Received on Monday, 7 October 2002 06:49:57 UTC