- From: Tom Stephens <tomste@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 13:13:44 -0700
- To: "'Win Treese'" <treese@openmarket.com>
- Cc: "'IETF-TLS Working Group'" <ietf-tls@w3.org>
Thanks for the posting Win. I wanted to clarify a point concerning the process. I assume that for the 7/30 deliverables, all that will needed is a simple posting to the list. However, for the 8/31 deliverables, what is the preferred format for the detailed descriptions? Should these be submitted to the IETF as Internet-Drafts? Should these just be submitted as text files to the mailing list? Etc.? Tom Stephens >---------- >From: Win Treese[SMTP:treese@openmarket.com] >Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 1996 9:25 PM >To: ietf-tls@w3.org >Subject: making progress > > >As noted in the meeting summary, the group has >decided to move forward from SSL V3.0 as a starting >point. The draft posted two weeks ago has been revoked. > >There are a number of issues that we need to resolve, >most of which have already had discussion on the list. >A list of the ones I know about (at least) will be included >when the meeting minutes come out in a few days. > > >In order to make rapid progress and have a solid draft >for discussion in December, we need to identify all of the >issues we might possibly tackle, get detailed proposals for >them on the table, debate them, and then merge everything >into a discussion draft. > >Therefore, I propose that we proceed as follows: > >7/30/96 All issues on the table, with justifications why they > are important. On or about 8/2/96, I will post a > summary of where we are. Some issues may be > accepted or rejected in ensuing discussion during July. > >8/31/96 Proposed text/detailed descriptions for proposals due. > >9/30/96: Discussion on list of what we should move forward with. > >Early October: document editors/authors meet to hash out >the text. (Exact set to be determined) > >Mid-October: discussion draft available for review. > >November: discussion on the list, organization of issues remaining >for discussion at the San Jose meeting. > >December: meet in San Jose. > >I also propose that we limit discussion of this proposal to conclude >by Friday, 7/12, so we don't get bogged down in process discussions. > >Comments and suggestions welcome, either to the list or to me >privately. > > - Win Treese > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 1996 16:18:34 UTC