- From: Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 1996 09:50:06 -0400
- To: ietf-tls@w3.org
since when is ssl3 "current standard practice"? last I checked SSL2 was
current practice. I do not think it is at all reasonable to use either PCT
or SSL3 as some sort of "current standard practice".
I *wholly* agree that PCT and SSL3 and in fact other mutatations of one or
the other or both or something completely different are *completely* valid
proposals.
>Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1996 11:01:38 -0400
>Resent-Message-Id: <199604231501.LAA09125@www19.w3.org>
>X-Sender: treese@OpenMarket.com
>Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1996 10:53:00 -0400
>To: ietf-tls@w3.org
>From: Win Treese <treese@openmarket.com>
>Subject: what's going on
>X-List-URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-tls
>Resent-From: ietf-tls@w3.org
>X-Mailing-List: <ietf-tls@w3.org> archive/latest/44
>X-Loop: ietf-tls@w3.org
>Sender: ietf-tls-request@w3.org
>Resent-Sender: ietf-tls-request@w3.org
>
>
... parts of message deleted for brevity...
> there is great value in standardizing existing practice rather
>than trying to invent something from whole cloth.
Rodney Thayer :: rodney@sabletech.com
Sable Technology Corp :: +1 617 332 7292
246 Walnut St :: Fax: +1 617 332 7970
Newton MA 02160 USA :: http://www.shore.net/~sable
"Developers of communications software"
Received on Friday, 26 April 1996 09:50:37 UTC