Re: Call for Adoption: draft-annevk-johannhof-httpbis-cookies

I'm supportive of this draft's adoption, and am hopeful to use its
improvements over 6265bis to more clearly define how WHATWG specs use
cookies.

On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 4:26 PM Yoav Weiss <yoav.weiss@shopify.com> wrote:

> Exciting work!! I'm supportive of this draft's adoption.
>
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 12:10 AM Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>
>> Everyone,
>>
>> This is a Call for Adoption of the following document:
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-annevk-johannhof-httpbis-cookies-01.html
>>
>> This is a further revision of the Cookie specification, based upon
>> rfc6265bis, which has been approved by the IESG. It's expected that the
>> final RFC from that process will contain a few changes suggested by the
>> IESG's review as well as the RFC Editor; these will be back ported to the
>> draft if we adopt it.
>>
>> See a diff from the current 6265bis here:
>>
>> https://author-tools.ietf.org/diff?doc_1=draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis&doc_2=draft-annevk-johannhof-httpbis-cookies
>>
>> We have discussed this document a few times:
>>
>> https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/ietf120/minutes.html#revising-cookies-again
>>   https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/ietf120/future-cookies.pdf
>>
>> https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/ietf122/minutes.html#cookies-http-state-management-mechanism
>>
>> As in past revisions of this specification, adding any significant new
>> features will require a separate specification, for which we'll issue a
>> separate Call for Adoption.
>>
>> As a reminder, adopting a document does not imply consensus on its
>> contents; issues can and will be raised to change it. We are agreeing on a
>> starting point for our work.
>>
>> Please state whether or not you support adoption in response to this
>> e-mail. If you do not support adoption, explaining your reasoning would
>> help us evaluate consensus.
>>
>> This call will end on 2 May 2025.
>>
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>>
>>
>>