- From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 08:22:06 +0200 (CEST)
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025, Mark Nottingham wrote: > This is a Call for Adoption of the following document: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-annevk-johannhof-httpbis-cookies-01.html I'm curious on this group's, and the IETF's in general, take on references to (moving) WHATWG documents instead of IETF ones, like this draft introduces. See [INFRA] and [URL]. I'm in particular concernced about the second, as I believe its inconsistencies with RFC 3986 and the effects of those differences (if any) on cookies are hard to assess. In particular since that document, contrary to IETF documents, is a "living" document. What was true yesterday might not be true tomorrow. If there is no (practical) difference, I figure referencing RFC 3986 would be better, as that is fixed and known. -- / daniel.haxx.se
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2025 06:22:13 UTC