- From: Yoav Weiss <yoav.weiss@shopify.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 22:22:50 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
- Message-ID: <CALYmMaciJ8-o_61=NQqvAr2BoCSjzM4WvLWC1dNYhoCSO5p3uQ@mail.gmail.com>
Exciting work!! I'm supportive of this draft's adoption. On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 12:10 AM Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Everyone, > > This is a Call for Adoption of the following document: > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-annevk-johannhof-httpbis-cookies-01.html > > This is a further revision of the Cookie specification, based upon > rfc6265bis, which has been approved by the IESG. It's expected that the > final RFC from that process will contain a few changes suggested by the > IESG's review as well as the RFC Editor; these will be back ported to the > draft if we adopt it. > > See a diff from the current 6265bis here: > > https://author-tools.ietf.org/diff?doc_1=draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis&doc_2=draft-annevk-johannhof-httpbis-cookies > > We have discussed this document a few times: > > https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/ietf120/minutes.html#revising-cookies-again > https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/ietf120/future-cookies.pdf > > https://httpwg.org/wg-materials/ietf122/minutes.html#cookies-http-state-management-mechanism > > As in past revisions of this specification, adding any significant new > features will require a separate specification, for which we'll issue a > separate Call for Adoption. > > As a reminder, adopting a document does not imply consensus on its > contents; issues can and will be raised to change it. We are agreeing on a > starting point for our work. > > Please state whether or not you support adoption in response to this > e-mail. If you do not support adoption, explaining your reasoning would > help us evaluate consensus. > > This call will end on 2 May 2025. > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > >
Received on Monday, 21 April 2025 20:23:07 UTC