- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:39:55 +0200
- To: Ryan Globus <rglobus@apple.com>
- Cc: Silas Barta <sbarta@gmail.com>, Ben Schwartz <bemasc@meta.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 08:26:42AM -0700, Ryan Globus wrote: > I agree with Ben that a 1xx status code makes more sense for this use case, given their definitions in https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#name-status-codes: > > * 1xx (Informational): The request was received, continuing process > * 3xx (Redirection): Further action needs to be taken in order to complete the request > > Best, > Ryan Agreed! Willy
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2025 09:40:12 UTC