- From: Ryan Globus <rglobus@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 08:26:42 -0700
- To: Silas Barta <sbarta@gmail.com>
- Cc: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@meta.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-id: <CACA2473-0277-4882-8E65-E189B11BCA42@apple.com>
I agree with Ben that a 1xx status code makes more sense for this use case, given their definitions in https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#name-status-codes: * 1xx (Informational): The request was received, continuing process * 3xx (Redirection): Further action needs to be taken in order to complete the request Best, Ryan > On Apr 2, 2025, at 8:16 AM, Silas Barta <sbarta@gmail.com> wrote: > > No -- I'm comparing it to the redirection status codes like 301 and 302. > > On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 7:44 AM Ben Schwartz <bemasc@meta.com <mailto:bemasc@meta.com>> wrote: >> A 397 response MUST be followed by another HTTP response, similar to >> other 300-series HTTP status codes, where such response makes the >> best guess at what the client intended >> >> This seems like a mistake. Did you mean "100-series"? >> >> --Ben Schwartz >> From: Silas Barta <sbarta@gmail.com <mailto:sbarta@gmail.com>> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 1:57 PM >> To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org> <ietf-http-wg@w3.org <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>> >> Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sbarta-tolerating-00.txt >> >> Dear HTTP Working Group, >> >> I submit this Internet Draft for your consideration. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>> >> Date: Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 12:51 PM >> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-sbarta-tolerating-00.txt >> To: Silas Barta <sbarta@gmail.com <mailto:sbarta@gmail.com>> >> >> >> A new version of Internet-Draft draft-sbarta-tolerating-00.txt has been >> successfully submitted by Silas Barta and posted to the >> IETF repository. >> >> Name: draft-sbarta-tolerating >> Revision: 00 >> Title: An HTTP Status Code to Indicate Request Noncomformity While Still Making Best-Effort Response >> Date: 2025-04-01 >> Group: Individual Submission >> Pages: 5 >> URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-sbarta-tolerating-00.txt <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-sbarta-tolerating-00.txt__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!_6_aSVrFB7STV7sE_BjACiI1ZgaiauKh9U1CeeJdHeAcMKdndPlcJlsmDG37b5azw27mLzG8eg$> >> Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sbarta-tolerating/ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sbarta-tolerating/__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!_6_aSVrFB7STV7sE_BjACiI1ZgaiauKh9U1CeeJdHeAcMKdndPlcJlsmDG37b5azw24AfENRZA$> >> HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-sbarta-tolerating <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-sbarta-tolerating__;!!Bt8RZUm9aw!_6_aSVrFB7STV7sE_BjACiI1ZgaiauKh9U1CeeJdHeAcMKdndPlcJlsmDG37b5azw24DFrqUjQ$> >> >> >> Abstract: >> >> This document specifies a Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) status >> code for use when resource was accessed in a nonconforming manner >> but the request will be tolerated with reservation, while directing >> the client adhere to relevant protocols. >> >> >> >> The IETF Secretariat >> >>
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2025 06:17:27 UTC