Okay, reviewing the 100 series, I concur, this makes more sense there. I can't believe I didn't consider it. So, for the next revision, I think I should make this either its own 100-series status code -- say 197 Tolerating -- or a standardized header within the existing 103 Early Hints. Thoughts? On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 4:40 AM Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 08:26:42AM -0700, Ryan Globus wrote: > > I agree with Ben that a 1xx status code makes more sense for this use > case, given their definitions in > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#name-status-codes: > > > > * 1xx (Informational): The request was received, continuing process > > * 3xx (Redirection): Further action needs to be taken in order to > complete the request > > > > Best, > > Ryan > > Agreed! > > Willy >
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2025 15:21:05 UTC