- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 08:56:57 +0100
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 07.03.2023 18:39, Justin Richer wrote: > ... >> 2.1.1 - use of ;bs - the term “known by the application to cause >> problems with >> canonicalization” is handwaving. Step 3 of this algorithm seems to >> assume that >> all field values have an unique ASCII representation; is this assumption >> warranted? >> > > For the algorithm to be applied, yes, there needs to be a stable set of > bytes to encode. If that doesn’t exist, then you can’t use this. If > there’s a better source for the “bytes of the field value” from HTTP > semantics, I’d happily refer to that rather than lean on ASCII. > ... FWIW, this is <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/2415>. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 8 March 2023 07:57:12 UTC