On 07.03.2023 18:39, Justin Richer wrote: > ... >> All of section 2.2 seems to assume that we’re dealing only with HTTP >> URLs. This >> assumption should be made explicit. > > This specification is signing for HTTP messages. What other URLs would > there be at play here? It seems redundant to call it out, especially > because we’re using the terms from the HTTP semantics specification to > define the components. > ... HTTP can in theory also be used to access resources with non-HTTP(s) URIs. In HTTP/1.1, you can use the absolute form of the request target for that. Is it common? No (I believe). Best regards, JulianReceived on Friday, 10 March 2023 08:02:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 10 March 2023 08:02:03 UTC