On 23.01.2023 07:56, Mark Nottingham wrote: > > >> On 19 Dec 2022, at 9:28 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> >> This sort of confirms that we really need to figure out what the >> expectations for users of SF (be it implementations or specifications) >> are - is support of sf-date an extension you need to opt in somehow? > > Yes - by emitting or consuming a field that uses it. When I invoke an SF parser - how do I signal to the parser that I want support for sf-date? Best regards, JulianReceived on Monday, 23 January 2023 10:04:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:44:08 UTC