W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2023

Re: signatures vs sf-date

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 11:04:13 +0100
Message-ID: <a4cae48c-960f-0edb-33c5-19e01b7e4093@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 23.01.2023 07:56, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
>
>> On 19 Dec 2022, at 9:28 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> This sort of confirms that we really need to figure out what the
>> expectations for users of SF (be it implementations or specifications)
>> are - is support of sf-date an extension you need to opt in somehow?
>
> Yes - by emitting or consuming a field that uses it.

When I invoke an SF parser - how do I signal to the parser that I want
support for sf-date?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 23 January 2023 10:04:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:44:08 UTC