Re: signatures vs sf-date

> On 19 Dec 2022, at 9:28 pm, Julian Reschke <> wrote:
> This sort of confirms that we really need to figure out what the
> expectations for users of SF (be it implementations or specifications)
> are - is support of sf-date an extension you need to opt in somehow?

Yes - by emitting or consuming a field that uses it.

Mark Nottingham

Received on Monday, 23 January 2023 06:56:52 UTC