W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2023

Re: signatures vs sf-date

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 17:56:09 +1100
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <FEA9B22C-B3AC-48D0-B4AC-64BADB8E8F18@mnot.net>
To: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>


> On 19 Dec 2022, at 9:28 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> This sort of confirms that we really need to figure out what the
> expectations for users of SF (be it implementations or specifications)
> are - is support of sf-date an extension you need to opt in somehow?

Yes - by emitting or consuming a field that uses it.


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 23 January 2023 06:56:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:44:08 UTC