- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 02:30:43 +1100
- To: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
- Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
No real relationship (at least yet). > On 10 Nov 2021, at 12:59 am, Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> wrote: > > I support adoption. > > I am curious what relationship (if any) there is to the binary structured fields I-D [1]. > > Cheers, > Lucas > > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-binary-structured-headers/ > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 1:55 PM Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:17:03PM +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > This draft was discussed in our last interim, and there seemed to be interest > > in adoption. Additionally, the newly formed OHAI working group has a > > dependency on it: > > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomson-http-binary-message/> > > > > So, this kicks off a one-week call for adoption for this draft. Please > > respond saying whether you support adoption of this draft as a work item. > > For having worked on related concepts on this in the past, I think it > makes a lot of sense to try to standardize a way to reliably serialize > a message. > > Thus +1 for adoption! > Willy > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2021 15:31:11 UTC