Re: Call for Adoption: Binary Representation of HTTP Messages

I support adoption.

I am curious what relationship (if any) there is to the binary structured
fields I-D [1].

Cheers,
Lucas

[1]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-binary-structured-headers/

On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 1:55 PM Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 10:17:03PM +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > This draft was discussed in our last interim, and there seemed to be
> interest
> > in adoption. Additionally, the newly formed OHAI working group has a
> > dependency on it:
> >   <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomson-http-binary-message/>
> >
> > So, this kicks off a one-week call for adoption for this draft. Please
> > respond saying whether you support adoption of this draft as a work item.
>
> For having worked on related concepts on this in the past, I think it
> makes a lot of sense to try to standardize a way to reliably serialize
> a message.
>
> Thus +1 for adoption!
> Willy
>
>