- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:55:28 +1100
- To: Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Ah - it's implied because these headers share directives with Cache-Control, but we should make that more explicit. Thanks! > On 5 Feb 2021, at 1:12 am, Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 07:44:18PM +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote: >>> On 27 Jan 2021, at 6:03 am, Piotr Sikora <piotrsikora@google.com> wrote: >>> >>> CDN-Cache-Control (as written today) is limited to "max-age", >>> "must-revalidate", "no-store", "no-cache", and "private", so it >>> primarily fixes incompatibilities between "s-maxage" and "no-store" / >>> "no-cache". I don't believe it allows for expressing richer policy >>> than Cache-Control. >> >> CDN-Cache-Control, just like Cache-Control, is extensible -- see <https://httpwg.org/http-core/draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-latest.html#cache.control.extensions>. >> > > This (extensibility of CDN-Cache-Control) is not stated in the draft: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cdn-control-header-00 > > - Dmitri. > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 4 February 2021 23:55:45 UTC