- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:00:05 +1000
- To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Hi Martin, Just my personal .02 - this seems reasonable, as do the suggestions for folding in other subsequent changes. What about priorities? Cheers, > On 28 Aug 2020, at 5:15 pm, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote: > > All this tiresome talk about terminology got me thinking about the value of action over words. > > So, I present to you a proposed update to RFC 7540: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-thomson-httpbis-http2bis-00 > > This only does: > > * removes unnecessarily divisive terminology > * rolls up errata > > Obviously, there is a long and slippery slope of things that we might do from this point. However, I think that it would be good if we could just publish a minimal update without getting embroiled in difficult and time-consuming design questions. > > The diff is mostly just stuff that xml2rfc does differently five years on: > > https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://ietf.org/rfc/rfc7540.txt&url2=https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-httpbis-http2bis-00.txt > > Or you can peruse the individual changes I made: > > https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/compare/master...martinthomson:main > > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 28 August 2020 13:00:31 UTC