Re: Time to refresh HTTP/2?

On 28/08/20 7:15 pm, Martin Thomson wrote:
> All this tiresome talk about terminology got me thinking about the value of action over words.
> 
> So, I present to you a proposed update to RFC 7540:
> 
>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-thomson-httpbis-http2bis-00
> 
> This only does:
> 
> * removes unnecessarily divisive terminology
> * rolls up errata
> 
> Obviously, there is a long and slippery slope of things that we might do from this point.  However, I think that it would be good if we could just publish a minimal update without getting embroiled in difficult and time-consuming design questions.
> 
> The diff is mostly just stuff that xml2rfc does differently five years on:
> 
>   https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://ietf.org/rfc/rfc7540.txt&url2=https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-thomson-httpbis-http2bis-00.txt
> 
> Or you can peruse the individual changes I made:
> 
>   https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/compare/master...martinthomson:main
> 
> 


+1.

Amos

Received on Friday, 28 August 2020 11:53:22 UTC