- From: Bin Ni <nibin@quantil.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 11:45:26 -0700
- To: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
- Cc: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFifEMK5WS8qqUK_jPJd9uSJDy3aZO=KgtXBwZjUjg8MsPjYtg@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for your comments Patrick. For whoever finds this proposal interesting, backward compatibility should not be an issue. The benefits should be way greater than the "burden" of checking client capability. Bin On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 6:13 AM Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com> wrote: > Use of Alt-Svc instead of Location in a 3xx makes some sense to me for > this very edge case of a single large xfer. Server side resource balancing > is an important property, and if you have some really big resources it can > really make the system unresponsive and paying the latency penalty that > alt-svc normally avoids might be worth the cost... avoiding the state where > you have the same resource under a lot of different URIs is a good goal. > > Its going to be hard to bootstrap in a backwards compatible way though > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 7:11 AM Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019, at 19:56, Bin Ni wrote: >> > Hi Martin, >> > >> > I explained this in my very first email: >> > 3xx breaks cookie and https. >> >> You can give the second server a discrete name (so that it can use HTTPS) >> and you can pass any state it requires in the URL (obviating the need for >> using cookies to pass state). >> >> -- Bin Ni VP of Engineering [image: Quantil] Connecting users with content...it's that simple. Office: +1-888-847-9851 <(888)%20847-9851> [image: Tweeter] <https://twitter.com/Team_Quantil> [image: Google Plus] <https://plus.google.com/+Quantil_team/> [image: Linked In] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/quantil> The information contained in this email may be confidential and/or legally privileged. It has been sent for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender and destroy all copies of the message. To contact us directly, send to QUANTIL, INC. at 1919 S Bascom Ave #600, Campbell, CA 95008 <https://maps.google.com/?q=1919+S+Bascom+Ave+%23600,+Campbell,+CA+95008&entry=gmail&source=g>, or visit our website at www.quantil.com. <https://www.quantil.com/>
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2019 18:46:02 UTC