Re: Activity Identifiers - Draft Submission

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 09:14:40AM +0100,
 Scott Perham <scott@polystream.com> wrote 
 a message of 125 lines which said:

> an omission in HTTP (at least in my experience) and something that
> is re-invented over and over again with,

You apparently don't mention in the draft these reinventions. Specific
and actual examples could be nice (may be in an appendix) to get a
better idea of the problem you want to solve.

More generally, I find it difficult to understand this problem. A
detailed explanation of some use cases could help.

Also, the abstract says "to maintain a record of their
interaction with the server or to track client/server requests through
a disparate system of services" but why not using RFC 6265 here? This
also is worth a discussion in the draft (may be again in an appendix).

Received on Thursday, 23 May 2019 11:03:31 UTC