On Fri., 3 May 2019, 20:40 Julian Reschke, <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > > On 03.05.2019 11:04, Matthew Kerwin wrote: > > ... > >>> That's actually a good point, but then there's the recent > >>> <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/797>: > >>> > >>>> in Signed Exchanges, @jyasskin asks about having Parameterised Lists whose parameterised identifiers are things other than Tokens. > >> > >> I don't see the connection. > >> > > > > 'Link' is a parameterised list of URI references. If we add a URI > > reference type, and param-list is extended to allow URI references > > alongside tokens, then it could maybe fit. > > Right, > > > Though then there are "what to do if you receive a Link header value > > with parameterised tokens instead of parameterised URI references" > > stuff, which is why I'm still not 100% sold. > > Why would that be a problem? It's just another error condition. > > Best regards, Julian > That's fair. I keep thinking about, like, schemas or profiles or Java generics. I wonder if there's some sort of extension or informational document to write that could help, or at least offer guidance. Cheers -- Matthew KerwinReceived on Wednesday, 8 May 2019 23:51:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 2 February 2023 18:44:01 UTC