W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2019

Re: Structured Headers: URI type (#782)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 12:39:05 +0200
To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Message-ID: <c3f528c0-2562-f6f6-4fc1-6052c7b42e99@gmx.de>
On 03.05.2019 11:04, Matthew Kerwin wrote:
> ...
>>> That's actually a good point, but then there's the recent
>>> <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/797>:
>>>
>>>> in Signed Exchanges, @jyasskin asks about having Parameterised Lists whose parameterised identifiers are things other than Tokens.
>>
>> I don't see the connection.
>>
>
> 'Link' is a parameterised list of URI references.  If we add a URI
> reference type, and param-list is extended to allow URI references
> alongside tokens, then it could maybe fit.

Right,

> Though then there are "what to do if you receive a Link header value
> with parameterised tokens instead of parameterised URI references"
> stuff, which is why I'm still not 100% sold.

Why would that be a problem? It's just another error condition.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 3 May 2019 10:40:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:15:34 UTC