- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 12:39:05 +0200
- To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
On 03.05.2019 11:04, Matthew Kerwin wrote: > ... >>> That's actually a good point, but then there's the recent >>> <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/797>: >>> >>>> in Signed Exchanges, @jyasskin asks about having Parameterised Lists whose parameterised identifiers are things other than Tokens. >> >> I don't see the connection. >> > > 'Link' is a parameterised list of URI references. If we add a URI > reference type, and param-list is extended to allow URI references > alongside tokens, then it could maybe fit. Right, > Though then there are "what to do if you receive a Link header value > with parameterised tokens instead of parameterised URI references" > stuff, which is why I'm still not 100% sold. Why would that be a problem? It's just another error condition. Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 3 May 2019 10:40:30 UTC