Hi Spencer, On Thu, Dec 6, 2018, at 3:10 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote: > Hi, Alexey, > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 8:55 AM Alexey Melnikov > <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> wrote:>> >> > I see that >> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-bcp56bis/ is in>> > WGLC now, so maybe it's not worth mentioning, but I'm getting a >> > sense that ART>> > and TSV are going to be having more conversations about the >> > evolution of>> > transport that involve HTTP as an application substrate. TSVAREA >> > gave over our>> > entire agenda at IETF 103 for topics in this space. It might be >> > that the ART>> > ADs would not have those conversations in HTTPbis, or would be >> > part of a later>> > recharter, but I did want to ask if they should be in charter for >> > HTTPbis now,>> > since we're balloting on an update. >> >> If you can suggest some specific text, maybe we can discuss? > > My question was more high-level - whether these discussions would be > part of the HTTPbis charter, or might happen somewhere else.> > It's OK if we don't know the answer to that yet. I just wanted to ask > while you've got the HTTPbis charter open for minor surgery :-)I don't know answer to this. I am open to suggestions. I am also happy if we decide later. > > Spencer > >> >> > And a nit - if "The Working Group will refine the "core" HTTP >> > document set (RFC>> > 7230-RFC 7235)" actually means "revise" that document set, I'd >> > suggest saying>> > so. >> >> Happy to do this change. >> >> Best Regards, >> Alexey
Received on Thursday, 6 December 2018 15:14:21 UTC