Thanks. This addresses my concern, and I will clear my discuss once a new version of the document is in the i-d repository. /a On 11/10/18 11:31 AM, Emily Stark wrote: > Hi Adam, > Thanks for the review. I've addressed your comments in > https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/d6e31360bdeeace4b8271162b0a8d25b836eb446. > (Some of them had already been fixed during other reviews.) > Emily > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 9:25 AM Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de > <mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de>> wrote: > > On 9/13/2018 8:54 AM, Adam Roach wrote: > > ... > > ยง2.1.3: > > > >> The "max-age" directive is REQUIRED to be present within an > "Expect- > >> CT" header field. > > > > This doesn't appear to be true as stated; or, at least, it is > stated in a > > somewhat confusing way. A casual reading of this requirement is > that an > > "Expect-CT" header field is noncompliant if it is missing this > directive. > > Based on the examples given, the actual requirement here is that > a response > > that contains an Expect-CT header field MUST contain an > Expect-CT header field > > with a max-age directive, although that directive does not > necessarily need to > > appear in each Expect-CT header field. This should probably be > clarified. > > ... > > That's another case where progress on > <https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/111> would help. This > plagues other WG drafts as well. > > Best regards, Julian >
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2018 22:29:05 UTC