- From: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 17:54:21 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
- Cc: httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018, at 12:26 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Hi Mirja, > > On 10 Nov 2018, at 5:52 pm, Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote: > > > First an editorial one: should it be "HTTP/2 Revision" instead of "HTTP/1.1 > > Revision", or maybe just "HTTP Revision(s)"? > > The documents that refers to are the HTTP/1.1 document set, although > many of them will emerge as just "HTTP...". > > > > Then regarding the HTTP and QUIC part. I found it a bit weird and probably also > > unecessary to mention review intentions in the charter. > > They're mentioned in the QUIC charter, so it seemed good to mirror them here. > > > > However, I guess we > > need at some point to discuss what to do with HTTP/3 after the QUIC group has > > finsihed their mapping document. Is the intention to do another re-charter > > then? Should we then maybe just wait until we have a better plan before we say > > anything about this in ther httpbis charter? > > The chairs discussed this and I thought we'd agreed on some text, but I > see that hasn't made it into datatracker; Alexey? I have updated the charter since. Mirja, can you double check charter-ietf-httpbis-07-01? > > The timing doesn't seem to be > > optional for me here but I assume the recharter is coming up because H2 is > > basically done...? > > We realised that the charter was pretty out-of-date, and this initiated > before we had the discussion about maintenance of the QUIC HTTP > documents.
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2018 17:54:45 UTC