- From: Ori Finkelman <orif@qwilt.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 23:40:37 +0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Ryan Hamilton <rch@google.com>, Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, ggie@ietf.org, "Begen, Ali (Contractor)" <Ali_Begen@comcast.com>
- Message-ID: <CAMb9nTt2b_qZGwnYA43DU+t4Wr88a7m7AF-PwEZm8Pu-e7TQjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Julian, I think clarifications would help relating section 5.1.2 of rfc3986. ... For a document that is enclosed within another entity, such as a message or archive, the retrieval context is that entity. Thus, the default base URI of a representation is the base URI of the entity in which the representation is encapsulated. Now that I know that encapsulating the URI is not encapsulating the the document itself, it is clear, however since this was under discussion of quite a few people, before bringing it to HTTPbis, and we all missed it, it might be good to help the reader by emphasizing this difference. I think one confusing point was the use of HTML5 embedding tags such as <embed> or <video> may lead you to the wrong conclusion that your document is "embedded" within the encapsulation, while it is only logically embedded. I am not sure what would be a good phrasing for that, but maybe something along the line of: "Note that a URI enclosed within another entity is not an encapsulation of a document. Therefore the base URI of such a document that is retrieved by such a URI, must be established according to section 5.1.3" If it doesn't make sense to add such a clarification, we can do it on an external document we (the SVA) will be publishing for the video players development community. Best regards, Ori On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:08 AM Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > On 2018-11-06 02:51, Ori Finkelman wrote: > > While I agree that Alt-Svc may be the to better solution looking > > forward, we still need to resolve the issue for existing HTTP redirect > > architectures, mainly for HLS as it is still the dominating video > > streaming protocol, but for DASH also. > > HTTP redirect is widely in use and clients that don't conform with the > > relative resolution, as it seems to be the case, degrades qoe and cause > > a significant performance hit on CDN load balancers. > > > > If there is agreement that in case the playlist is requested separately, > > and it is not embedded within another encapsulating entity, then the > > playlist base URI is the final retrieval URI, after redirect, it would > > be great if there could be some clarifications that establish this > > understanding. > > ... > > Where exactly do you think a clarification is needed? > > Best regards, Julian > -- *Ori Finkelman*Qwilt | Work: +972-72-2221647 | Mobile: +972-52-3832189 | orif@qwilt.com
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2018 16:41:29 UTC