Re: 425 (Too Early)

On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 01:55:31PM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Now, we could make an argument to skip over it now and use it when we've
> exhausted other 4NN code points, but personally my inclination is to do it
> now; if we don't want it to ossify, the earlier the better.

I have an argument for skipping it, which is that it's part of a
contiguous range of 3 codes and that we need only one. There are
isolated holes likes 425 and 427 and I'd rather fill these holes
when we need a single code, and use larger areas when we need
contiguous series.


Received on Saturday, 5 August 2017 06:09:21 UTC