- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 08:08:45 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 01:55:31PM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Now, we could make an argument to skip over it now and use it when we've > exhausted other 4NN code points, but personally my inclination is to do it > now; if we don't want it to ossify, the earlier the better. I have an argument for skipping it, which is that it's part of a contiguous range of 3 codes and that we need only one. There are isolated holes likes 425 and 427 and I'd rather fill these holes when we need a single code, and use larger areas when we need contiguous series. Cheers, Willy
Received on Saturday, 5 August 2017 06:09:21 UTC