- From: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 07:26:10 +0900
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi Willy, 2017-06-26 17:01 GMT+09:00 Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>: > Hi Kazuho, > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:03:24PM +0900, Kazuho Oku wrote: >> One question: is the name `early-data` a good choice? >> >> The reason I raise the concern is because what the header suggest is >> if the endpoint has not yet seen a proof (i.e. ClientFinished). The >> name "early-data" might be confusing since it may seem to imply _when_ >> the request has been received rather than the current state of the >> connection. > > You mean that you'd prefer something indicating that there were unsafe > (ie not yet validated) early data in fact, that's it ? Yes. That was my intention. > Willy -- Kazuho Oku
Received on Monday, 26 June 2017 22:26:43 UTC