W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2017

Re: [TLS] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-http-replay-00.txt

From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:01:31 +0200
To: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20170626080131.GC3730@1wt.eu>
Hi Kazuho,

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:03:24PM +0900, Kazuho Oku wrote:
> One question: is the name `early-data` a good choice?
> 
> The reason I raise the concern is because what the header suggest is
> if the endpoint has not yet seen a proof (i.e. ClientFinished). The
> name "early-data" might be confusing since it may seem to imply _when_
> the request has been received rather than the current state of the
> connection.

You mean that you'd prefer something indicating that there were unsafe
(ie not yet validated) early data in fact, that's it ?

Willy
Received on Monday, 26 June 2017 08:02:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:15:03 UTC