- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 06:48:38 +0200
- To: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:22:02AM +0900, Kazuho Oku wrote: > 2017-05-18 10:22 GMT+09:00 Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>: > > Kazuho has indicated that he thinks this draft is ready for WGLC, and we have no open issues. > > > > Please have a look at: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-02 > > .. and raise any issues you see here or on the issues list. Statements of support / intent to implement would also be helpful. > > > > WGLC will end in two weeks, on 1 June 2017. > > Thank you for changing the state to WGLC. > > The only change that was made in the -02 draft (which was submitted on > Tuesday) is editorial improvements from Mark. I would appreciate it if > you could take a look. IMO the text is much clear and concise than > -01. It looks pretty good to me. I just think that one example could have been nice (since not everybody is familiar with informational responses), to make it visually clear that you can get one or a few 103 prior to a 200 for a single request. I expect it to work out of the box through haproxy, and in general I intend to make sure it will. Regards, Willy
Received on Thursday, 18 May 2017 04:49:18 UTC