Re: h2specd

On 9 August 2016 at 09:50, Mike Bishop <> wrote:

> I like the idea, but I misunderstood the intent from your message.  I read
> it as a set of tests *for* an HTTP/2 server, but looking at the GitHub
> page, it appears to *be* an HTTP server that tests clients.  Is that
> correct?  If so, I'd like to see the reverse as well -- submitting similar
> cases to an HTTP/2 server to test compliance.
already exists[1]; I use it to test my dev server.
h2spec*d* is, presumably the daemon/server equivalent.


  Matthew Kerwin

Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2016 00:15:46 UTC