- From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 08:38:41 -0400
- To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 29 July 2016 12:39:19 UTC
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > > Taking a second thought about it there are also some hidden security > considerations around potentially storing the reply to non-volatile > storage when a 'Cache-Control:no-store' is deferred to Trailers. > > Could indeed be true - that was part of the workshop discussion too. There seemed to be general confidence that trailers could be exposed as separate connection specific meta-data (i.e. here are your trailers that might contain some debugging - they aren't headers) but whether or not they could ever be treated semantically as headers (either generally or in specific cases - which might have different answers) needed more work to determine. Given that it is a connection level mechanism it might not be terribly helpful though.
Received on Friday, 29 July 2016 12:39:19 UTC