Re: obsoleting RFC6454? (was: Defining First and Third Party Cookies) from jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com on 2016-07-20 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2016)

From: <jeff.hodges@kingsmountain.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:33:27 -0600
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20160720003327.Horde.v2MqWlNWU3TBM2q6PdWlKUZ@box514.bluehost.com>

Quoting Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>:

> On 2016-03-03 12:10, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
>>> I think we need precision somewhere. I'm fairly agnostic about where that
>>> somewhere might be. Adding Anne, who might be interested in defining terms
>>> like these in Fetch?
>>
>> Seems fine. (Though note that the Origin RFC comparison does not quite
>> fly, it's made obsolete by the combination of HTML, Fetch, and URL
>> Standards.)
>
> So, out of curiosity: what *exactly* should a spec cite now when it  
> talks about origins (and is that actually compatible with RFC 6454)?

good question :)

Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2016 06:34:03 UTC