- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:59:48 +0200
- To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Cc: Yanick Rochon <yanick.rochon@gmail.com>, Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2016-07-11 11:29, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > -------- > In message <40e62f5c-9fe4-35c0-d986-c01fb63f6b4e@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes > : > >> I would call it: "steer them to a format that is robust with regards how >> header fields can be repeated in messages" > > You still have not given any reasoning why repeating them is good idea > in the first place. It may not have been a good idea in the first place, but that's what we currently have in HTTP, both 1.* and 2. I'm arguing that it's better to live with it, and to make things as consistent as possible with respect to this. Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 11 July 2016 10:00:33 UTC