Re: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc5987bis, was: Call for Adoption: draft-reschke-rfc54987bis

On 2015-10-01 14:06, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> --------
> In message <560D2065.5060803@greenbytes.de>, Julian Reschke writes:
>
>> We could. But then we'd define something new, instead of just updating a
>> specification of something that has been used for something like 15
>> years already.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> We can and should new ways to address this (and the JSON-in-field-values
>> spec is one proposal). But this is not the spec to do this.
>
> So why bother updating a 15 year old spec, why not focus on the
> JSON-in-field-values stuff and move forward ?

Because I'd like to have accurate documentation of a format that is in 
use and isn't going to go away.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Thursday, 1 October 2015 12:15:39 UTC