- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 12:06:08 +0000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
- cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <560D2065.5060803@greenbytes.de>, Julian Reschke writes: >We could. But then we'd define something new, instead of just updating a >specification of something that has been used for something like 15 >years already. > >[...] > >We can and should new ways to address this (and the JSON-in-field-values >spec is one proposal). But this is not the spec to do this. So why bother updating a 15 year old spec, why not focus on the JSON-in-field-values stuff and move forward ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2015 12:06:39 UTC