W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2015

Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0

From: Vimala Tadepalli <vimla.c@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:31:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKwtvnD5k6YJxvCMr-=qtaWUo+ygoH-Eb4u-1koOKxGPvN1A9A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I should be using "Literal Header Field never Indexed" to add a new header?
Thanks
Vimala

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:

> HTTP2 is semantically the same.
> It'd depend on the implementation of the firewall, rather than anything
> else.
>
> -=R
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Vimala Tadepalli <vimla.c@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I work on a firewall, where we need to add a header to the client request
>> going to the server.
>>
>> Topology is
>>
>> Client -------> Firewall -------> Servers
>>
>> Ex: Suppose a request is going to youtube, a new header "
>> X-YouTube-Edu-Filter" has to be added to the request.
>>
>> In HTTP 1.0/1.1, this is feasible
>> I tried with SPDY as well and Server did accept the request and
>> redirected accordingly.
>>
>> In HTTP 2.0, can i do this?
>> If a header is added at firewall, client and server dynamic tables might
>> go out of sync. Will it cause any issues?
>>
>> Any suggestion is greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Vimala
>>
>>
>
Received on Monday, 30 March 2015 23:32:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:43 UTC