- From: Vimala Tadepalli <vimla.c@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 16:31:55 -0700
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 30 March 2015 23:32:23 UTC
I should be using "Literal Header Field never Indexed" to add a new header? Thanks Vimala On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > HTTP2 is semantically the same. > It'd depend on the implementation of the firewall, rather than anything > else. > > -=R > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Vimala Tadepalli <vimla.c@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I work on a firewall, where we need to add a header to the client request >> going to the server. >> >> Topology is >> >> Client -------> Firewall -------> Servers >> >> Ex: Suppose a request is going to youtube, a new header " >> X-YouTube-Edu-Filter" has to be added to the request. >> >> In HTTP 1.0/1.1, this is feasible >> I tried with SPDY as well and Server did accept the request and >> redirected accordingly. >> >> In HTTP 2.0, can i do this? >> If a header is added at firewall, client and server dynamic tables might >> go out of sync. Will it cause any issues? >> >> Any suggestion is greatly appreciated. >> >> Thanks >> Vimala >> >> >
Received on Monday, 30 March 2015 23:32:23 UTC