W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2015

Re: Header addition with HTTP 2.0

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:53:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNftsP2XqP7HNQMrETN6vWjqA05ShSX2jvC7oV1ff5Po-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vimala Tadepalli <vimla.c@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
HTTP2 is semantically the same.
It'd depend on the implementation of the firewall, rather than anything
else.

-=R

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Vimala Tadepalli <vimla.c@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I work on a firewall, where we need to add a header to the client request
> going to the server.
>
> Topology is
>
> Client -------> Firewall -------> Servers
>
> Ex: Suppose a request is going to youtube, a new header "
> X-YouTube-Edu-Filter" has to be added to the request.
>
> In HTTP 1.0/1.1, this is feasible
> I tried with SPDY as well and Server did accept the request and redirected
> accordingly.
>
> In HTTP 2.0, can i do this?
> If a header is added at firewall, client and server dynamic tables might
> go out of sync. Will it cause any issues?
>
> Any suggestion is greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks
> Vimala
>
>
Received on Monday, 30 March 2015 21:53:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:43 UTC