Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol

On 28/03/2015 6:54 a.m., Martin Thomson wrote:
> Oh, and I have to apologize for dropping the ball on this one.  It
> somehow didn't get recorded as an issue.  I have corrected that:
> On 27 March 2015 at 12:53, Martin Thomson wrote:
>> On 27 March 2015 at 01:49, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>>> I'm fine with several proposals, as long as there's the ALPN name in
>>> the header name to indicate that whatever value is advertised must be
>>> a valid, registered ALPN token.
>> Would everyone be OK with the following header field name: "ALPN" ?

Okay by me too.

Though the header is of less interest for Squid in its current form than
I had thought earlier.


Received on Saturday, 28 March 2015 05:01:24 UTC