- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 12:54:55 -0500
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Cc: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Oh, and I have to apologize for dropping the ball on this one. It somehow didn't get recorded as an issue. I have corrected that: https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/57 On 27 March 2015 at 12:53, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27 March 2015 at 01:49, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote: >> I'm fine with several proposals, as long as there's the ALPN name in >> the header name to indicate that whatever value is advertised must be >> a valid, registered ALPN token. > > Would everyone be OK with the following header field name: "ALPN" ?
Received on Friday, 27 March 2015 17:55:27 UTC