Re: Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol

On 26 March 2015 at 20:17, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com> wrote:
> Tunnel-TLS-ALPN to be used if the next layer is TLS
> Tunnel-ALPN if it's not TLS

As I mention up-thread, the presence of TLS is part of the protocol.
If the protocol negotiates TLS in-band, then it can be one protocol
identifier (STARTTLS or absence thereof is purely a function of the
protocol in use).

h2 and h2c are different protocols because the presence or absence of
TLS is fundamental.  I'd expect two tokens for any protocol that isn't
intrinsically able to decide about the status of TLS.

Received on Friday, 27 March 2015 17:57:45 UTC