- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:38:50 +0100
- To: mnot@mnot.net, draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression.all@ietf.org, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, barryleiba@computer.org
On 2015-02-17 15:55, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > A new version (-12) has been submitted for draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-12.txt > > > The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression/ > > Diff from previous version: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-12 > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > IETF Secretariat. So this now says: > The static table was created from the most frequent header fields > used by popular web sites, with the addition of HTTP/2-specific > pseudo-header fields (see Section 8.1.2.1 of [HTTP2]). For header > fields with a few frequent values, an entry was added for each of > these frequent values. For other header fields, an entry was added > with an empty value. Is that really true? How did Proxy-Auth* end up in the table then? It also leaves the reader to wonder why we did not remove header fields that can not appear in HTTP/2. I still believe we should actually *fix* the table. Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2015 15:39:32 UTC