- From: Hervé Ruellan <herve.ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:49:19 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: <mnot@mnot.net>, <draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression.all@ietf.org>, <httpbis-chairs@ietf.org>, <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, <barryleiba@computer.org>
The list of headers used to create the static table was created at the client side. This explains why the Proxy-Auth is in the table. Hervé On 02/17/2015 04:38 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2015-02-17 15:55, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > > > A new version (-12) has been submitted for > > draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-12.txt > > > > > > > > The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression/ > > > > Diff from previous version: > > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-12 > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > > submission > > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > > > IETF Secretariat. > > So this now says: > > > The static table was created from the most frequent header fields > > used by popular web sites, with the addition of HTTP/2-specific > > pseudo-header fields (see Section 8.1.2.1 of [HTTP2]). For header > > fields with a few frequent values, an entry was added for each of > > these frequent values. For other header fields, an entry was added > > with an empty value. > > Is that really true? How did Proxy-Auth* end up in the table then? > > It also leaves the reader to wonder why we did not remove header fields > that can not appear in HTTP/2. > > I still believe we should actually *fix* the table. > > Best regards, Julian > > >
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2015 16:49:55 UTC